Our rating philosophy
What a “7.8/10” or “9.2/10” actually means.
Our goal is to make online casino ratings as transparent as possible. When you see a score like
8.4/10 on Best 100 Casino, it is not a random number or a purely “emotional” opinion.
It is a summary of multiple factors that we evaluate for every brand: licensing, payments, bonus policy,
game selection, support quality, long–term reputation and more.
We look at online casinos from the perspective of a regular player who wants to deposit, play and withdraw
without surprises. That is why we pay extra attention to payout speed, limits, hidden terms and how
the casino behaves when there is a dispute. A huge welcome bonus is meaningless if the casino makes it
almost impossible to withdraw.
Our rating is never a guarantee that you will have a perfect experience — gambling always involves risk.
However, a higher score usually means fewer red flags, more consistent behaviour and a stronger track record.
A low score or a “Not recommended” label usually means we have seen serious issues with that brand.
Important: our ratings are editorial opinions based on available information.
They are designed to help you compare casinos and avoid obvious traps — not to replace your own judgment.
Always read the casino’s terms and conditions before depositing.
Score breakdown: what we measure
The main components that add up to the final 1–10 score.
For each online casino, we assign internal scores for several key categories.
They may use slightly different weights depending on the type of casino
(crypto–only, sports–first, bonus–focused, etc.), but in general we look at:
- License & ownership (20–30%) — where the casino is licensed, who owns it,
how long the company has been active and whether it has a history of scandals.
- Payments & payout speed (20–25%) — deposit methods, withdrawal methods,
processing times, limits, additional checks and hidden fees.
- Bonus policy (15–20%) — welcome offers, wagering requirements, game restrictions,
max cashout rules and clarity of bonus terms.
- Game selection & UX (10–15%) — number and quality of game providers,
live casino, mobile experience and overall ease of use.
- Reputation & complaints (20–25%) — player reports, public disputes,
how the casino responds to problems and whether it solves them.
Each of these components is scored on an internal scale and then combined into the final
rating you see on the casino page. We prefer to be conservative rather than optimistic:
if there is no reliable information, we assume the risk is higher.
For example, a casino with a strong license, fast payouts and transparent bonus rules will almost
always rank higher than a new offshore brand with an aggressive bonus and little reputation data.
Even if both websites look modern on the surface, long–term safety matters more than flashy design.
In simple terms, our rating tries to answer one question:
“How likely is it that a typical player can deposit, play, withdraw and be treated fairly here?”
Everything else — the size of the bonus, the number of games — comes second.
How we evaluate casino bonuses
Big numbers are meaningless if the rules are impossible.
Casino bonuses and free spins are often the first thing players see — and the first thing that can go wrong.
A welcome package of “500% up to 5,000” sounds amazing until you notice 60x wagering, low max bet limits
and a cap on withdrawals. That is why we read bonus terms and conditions carefully and treat them as a
separate rating factor.
When we look at a casino bonus, we pay attention to:
- the real value of the offer compared to the deposit;
- wagering requirements (how many times you must bet the bonus or deposit);
- eligible games and restricted game categories;
- maximum bet with an active bonus;
- maximum cashout from free spins or no–deposit offers;
- time limits and any unusual conditions hidden in the fine print.
A smaller but fair welcome bonus can result in a higher bonus score than an enormous offer that is
practically “unwinnable”. We also consider how clearly the casino explains its promotions:
honest and accessible wording is a positive sign, while vague or constantly changing rules are a red flag.
Remember: a casino bonus is optional. In many cases, playing without a bonus and with fewer restrictions
is a perfectly valid choice — especially if your main priority is fast withdrawals.
Payouts, payments and withdrawal limits
Why a “fast payout” claim is never taken at face value.
Reliable payments are at the core of our casino ratings. Many websites talk about “instant withdrawals”,
but in reality the process can be much slower and more complicated. We treat any promise of fast payouts
as something that must be verified, not just repeated.
For each casino we review, we look at:
- available deposit and withdrawal methods (cards, e–wallets, bank transfers, crypto, local options),
- minimum and maximum deposit/withdrawal amounts,
- internal pending time before the payment is processed,
- extra checks (manual KYC, source of funds requests) and how often they are used,
- whether the casino is known for freezing withdrawals or changing limits without warning.
Where possible, we perform real test withdrawals using our own money and document how long each step takes.
For new brands or for casinos in restricted regions, we rely more heavily on verified player reports and
public complaints.
Casinos that consistently pay out within a reasonable time frame and keep their limits stable get higher
payment scores. Operators that delay or decline withdrawals without clear reasons receive a much lower
rating, even if other parts of their offer look attractive.
Reputation, complaints and long–term behaviour
Looking beyond marketing and design.
A new casino can launch with a modern website and a huge welcome bonus, but only time shows how it behaves
when players actually start winning. That is why reputation is a major part of the Best 100 Casino rating.
We monitor public sources for recurring issues, such as:
- unpaid withdrawals and repeated “verification loops”,
- confiscations of winnings based on unclear bonus terms,
- account closures without explanation,
- changes in terms and conditions that apply retroactively,
- lack of response to player complaints and mediator platforms.
A single dispute does not automatically destroy a casino’s score — mistakes can happen.
What matters more is the pattern: does the casino resolve problems and adjust its rules,
or does it ignore players and repeat the same behaviour?
If we see a growing number of serious, unresolved complaints about a brand,
its rating is reduced and, in extreme cases, the casino can be flagged as “Not recommended”
or removed from our lists entirely.
Licensing, safety and responsible gambling
Why we care about jurisdiction and player protection tools.
Not all casino licenses are equal. A strong regulator with clear rules and real enforcement offers
more protection than a small offshore jurisdiction with minimal oversight. When we assess safety,
we look at both the license and the practical tools that help players stay in control.
In our safety check we consider:
- which authority has issued the license and how strict it is,
- whether the casino openly shows its license number and company details,
- availability of self–exclusion, deposit limits and reality checks,
- age verification and basic KYC controls,
- clarity of privacy and data protection policies.
A casino with robust responsible gambling tools, transparent ownership and a serious regulator
will generally receive a higher safety score. Crypto–only casinos with very light oversight can still
receive good ratings if they demonstrate consistent fairness and pay out winnings,
but we always highlight the extra risk.
Data sources and manual checks
Combining automation with real–world testing.
To keep reviews up to date, we use a mix of automated tools and manual research.
Automation helps us quickly scan changes in bonus terms, payment options and license details,
while manual checks focus on things that cannot be easily measured by a script:
support quality, tone of communication and how flexible a casino is when resolving issues.
Our main data sources include:
- casino websites and their official terms and conditions,
- license registries and corporate records where available,
- test accounts and real deposits on selected platforms,
- public complaint platforms and community reports,
- direct communication with casino representatives when possible.
We sometimes use AI–based tools to structure information or detect changes,
but our final assessment is always made by humans. If a casino updates its terms in a positive way,
improves payout speed or solves a series of past problems, we reflect that in the new score.
How often ratings are updated
Casino scores are not frozen forever.
Online casinos are dynamic products: new bonuses appear, game providers are added or removed,
regulators change their rules, payment processors come and go. Because of this,
a rating that was accurate a year ago might no longer reflect the current situation.
We aim to review our core list of casinos regularly and update ratings when:
- a license is lost or gained,
- withdrawal times improve or become significantly worse,
- major bonus terms change,
- there is a visible trend in player feedback (positive or negative),
- a brand rebrands, merges with another operator or changes ownership.
For very popular casinos, updates may happen more often, while smaller brands are checked in batches.
If you spot something outdated on our website, you can always contact us via the email listed on the
About page — we appreciate corrections and new information.
FAQ about our casino ratings
Common questions from players and casinos.
-
Does a higher score mean I will definitely get paid?
No. A higher score means that, based on our research, the casino has a better track record and fewer red flags.
It does not guarantee that every withdrawal will be successful.
Your own behaviour (for example, using VPN where it is forbidden, creating multiple accounts
or abusing bonuses) can still lead to account restrictions.
-
Can casinos pay to improve their rating or ranking position?
We work with affiliate programs and may receive commissions when players sign up via our links,
but casinos cannot buy a higher rating or pay to remove legitimate criticism.
If a brand wants a better score, it must improve its terms, payouts and support — not just its marketing budget.
-
Why do some casinos with huge bonuses have only average scores?
Because we prioritise fair rules and reliable payouts over raw bonus size.
A smaller but honest offer with realistic wagering is often more valuable than a massive promotion
with hidden traps. If a casino heavily restricts games, caps winnings or delays payouts,
its overall rating will reflect that, even if the bonus looks big.
-
Do you rate every online casino in existence?
No. There are thousands of gambling sites on the internet, and many of them are short–lived
or low–quality. Our goal is to curate a list of casinos that are relevant for most players,
cover different regions and types of offers, and can be realistically monitored over time.
You may find good brands that we have not reviewed yet — you can always suggest them to us.
-
I work for a casino. Can we request a review or an update?
Yes. If you represent a casino brand and believe that our information is incomplete or outdated,
you can contact us via the email on the
About page.
We are open to corrections and additional data, as long as it is verifiable.
However, we reserve the right to keep our editorial opinion if our own tests and player feedback
do not match the picture you present.
-
How should players use your ratings in practice?
Think of our ratings as a starting point, not the final word.
Use them to narrow down your options, read at least one full review for any casino you consider,
compare bonuses and payout terms, and then double–check key details on the casino’s own website.
Never deposit more than you can afford to lose, even at a highly rated casino.
When you are ready to explore, you can return to our main rankings page
or learn more about the project on the About Best 100 Casino page.
