Thousands of online casinos are fighting for your attention. Some are solid brands with fast payouts — others are slow, confusing or simply not worth your deposit. This guide gives you a simple checklist to quickly separate decent casinos from the ones you should skip.

Idea: you don’t need to understand every tiny rule. Focus on a few key signals: license, payments, bonus rules, support and responsible gambling tools.

1. Check the license first

A license doesn’t guarantee perfection, but it sets a minimum level of rules the casino must follow. Common options you’ll see:

The license is usually listed in the footer or “About / Terms” section. If you can’t find it after 30 seconds, that’s already a signal.

2. Look at payment methods and payout speed

A casino that wants long-term players tries to pay out quickly and offers popular methods in your country:

Check the “Payments” or “FAQ” page for two things:

3. Read bonus terms before claiming anything

A welcome offer like “100% up to €500 + 100 free spins” always comes with fine print. At minimum, look for:

If the wagering is very high (x50, x60) or there are many exclusions, the bonus is there mostly for marketing. It might be better to play without it.

4. Test the website and support

Spend 2–3 minutes clicking around before you deposit:

A short test can save you a lot of hassle later if something goes wrong or you need verification help.

5. Look for responsible gambling tools

Legit casinos offer tools to help you control your play:

If a casino doesn’t mention any of this, it cares more about short-term deposits than long-term players.

6. Use independent reviews as a shortcut

Editorial rankings like ours are not perfect, but they can save you time. We look at:

Use these reviews as a filter: remove the obviously weak casinos, then choose between the solid ones based on your own preferences (games, payment method, country restrictions).

Key takeaways

Tip: on our main page we highlight casinos where the combination of license, payments and bonus rules looks reasonable from an editorial point of view. Use it as a starting shortlist.